This recently dropped in my in-box,
Tough one, right? For the moment, the Israeli's have lost the PR battle over Gaza hands down. When though, one reads something like the piece above the balance of judgement moves from the emotional to the more rational.
Unfortunately, very little is as it might seem. The disinformation and propaganda war is very real and very sophisticated, covers all aspects of media and social media and is present in every single current conflict across the globe. No side is blameless and all are at it but the world becomes particularly tough to unravel when the game is played by high level players such as we see in the Middle East and in the Ukraine. Traditional reporters with the press and television have a very challenging role to fulfil and it has to be said, they aren't making a particularly good rub of things at present. The BBC for example, appear to have decided a long time ago that Israel are the bad guys and their reports do little to "inform and educate" but simply pass on the individual reporters personal view of the 100 square meters around wherever they happen to be when filming. (and please don't suggest you have free and open access to roam because you don't. You have the narrow view of the conflict that your minders, who are there for your safety, will allow you to have and please don't pretend otherwise).
Back to Dr Eidad.
We learn from the internet site Snopes.com, which is very good for checking the authenticity of stories circulating on the internet, that the story is real but historical. It dates from 2005 and was recorded in an interview with Dr Eldad in November 2008. Bits have been added to give it a current context and spin; you can read the details here.
So, bit of a cross look to whoever decided to doctor and disseminate a story that actually would have been more powerful left to its own merits. The key point however, is the Dr Eidad's concluding comment, "This is a civilizational conflict, or rather a war between civilization and barbarism."
I agree with that.
This is not just about Israel, and or Gaza, (indeed many are concerned, including the current players, that if Hamas was destroyed they would be replaced by extremists of a far more worrying profile), this is indeed about civilisation and I fear we are at the beginning of a protracted multi generational conflict in which we will ultimately prevail but the cost may be so much higher than it need be unless politicians openly acknowledge what their security advisor's are already telling them and have been for some time.
Indeed, and for the little it's worth, I believe we have to ruthlessly engage, suppress and destroy the looney jihadist elements in the Middle East then flood the poor Arab countries with economic aid to westernise them to an extent that it would be insane for them to cripple their families by returning to extremism. We have to find an answer to the huge demographic of unemployed 18-25 year olds in the north African and Middle Eastern countries who are uneducated, unemployed and have no future.... none. They are so vulnerable to radicalisation in fact its a wonder that anything is still standing.
On the other hand, we did exactly that in Afghanistan in the fifties and sixties when it was, at the time, an enlightened and prosperous country and quite westernised with modern housing, infrastructure and education. That didn't exactly work out to plan then.
It's a profoundly depressing legacy to leave behind after so much hope and optimism for peace that we briefly enjoyed twenty five years ago after the Wall came down. In breaking down the old order we unwittingly created a breeding ground for other historical prejudices and geopolitical fault lines to reemerge across Europe and the Middle East.
Life was a much simpler affair in the Cold War...... at least there were rules to the game.